We have already in the foregoing pages assigned two stations unto each of the Luminaries arising from the Daysprings of eternal holiness. One of these stations, the station of essential unity, We have already explained. “No distinction do We make between any of them.” The other is the station of distinction, and pertaineth to the world of creation and to the limitations thereof. In this respect, each Manifestation of God hath a distinct individuality, a definitely prescribed mission, a predestined Revelation, and specially designated limitations. Each one of them is known by a different name, is characterized by a special attribute, fulfills a definite Mission, and is entrusted with a particular Revelation. Even as He saith: “Some of the Apostles We have caused to excel the others. To some God hath spoken, some He hath raised and exalted. And to Jesus, Son of Mary, We gave manifest signs, and We strengthened Him with the Holy Spirit.”
Now that He has finished His explanation of that first of two stations that the Manifestations hold, that of "essential unity", He is ready to move on to the second, "the station of distinction". But he doesn't just move on to it and leave the other behind. Most of us, if discussing these two stations of the Manifestations of God would discuss one and then the other.
He has fully explained the one station, that of essential unity, and is now ready to discuss the second, that of distinction, but recognizes that it is very easy to forget about the former and become confused. So over the next number of paragraphs He will discuss both of them together. This is another example of His mercy to us, making sure that we don't get lost. But it is also an example of His view of unity. He doesn't even separate the ideas. He discusses one, and then He discusses both together.
Baha'u'llah will discuss these two themes for the next series of paragraphs up to 212. Now again, many commentators have divided this book into very different sections, and that's ok. There is no wrong way to do it. We are opting to include all these paragraphs from 191 through 212 in one section for the reason of method. Remember, our concern is about understanding the methods and arguments Baha'u'llah uses in this book to help the uncle of the Bab move from being a sincere seeker to a confirmed believer. The arguments, in many ways, are fairly straightforward, so our primary concern is the methods He uses. We will discuss this more at length as we get further into it.
But we just want to point out one other thing before we move on. As we were making our outline, we had recognized that He discussed the first station at length and we presumed He would talk about the second. But as we read ahead, that just didn't seem to be the case. It was like when we presumed that the whole of Part Two was about sovereignty, mainly because so many notable scholars said so. In both cases we felt that something wasn't quite right. We had to go back to the detachment He values so highly in Part One. We had to remember not to take "the words... of mortal men as a standard for the true understanding...", including our own. We had to look at this with our own eyes and "meditate profoundly" before coming to this realization. In university, and so many other areas of life, we go from one theme to another, treating them separately. Baha'u'llah is showing us a new way of looking at things, and this is but another example.
For now, though, let's focus on this one paragraph.
The first thing we note is that these two quotes from the Qur'an essentially outline the entire purpose of the next twenty-two paragraphs. “No distinction do We make between any of them.” “Some of the Apostles We have caused to excel the others..."
We have often noticed that He is very particular in His choice of quotes, so we can just presume that these two are here specifically to give us a heads up for where He is going. After all, they are the ones He has chosen to begin this whole section with. "No distinction..." "Some... We have caused to excel the others..."
They are apparently contradictory. No distinction, but some excel the others? Yes. Exactly. These two appear to contradict each other, but He is going to spend over twenty paragraphs showing how they work in tandem. He has already carefully given us a vision of this first concept, that of "no distinction", and is now going to show us how these two ideas work together. And remember, He already knows that if He talks about them separately we are likely to get even more confused. So He talks about them together.
This is so important to keep in mind as we move forward. This is why we are bringing it up again and again here. As we read ahead to figure out where He was going, it became more and more apparent that we needed to keep these two quotes firmly in mind, regularly referring back to them as we read ahead. This was what allowed us to begin to understand His methodology. Two quotes that both refer to the same thing, but from very different angles. No distinction, yet still different.
We know this is not easy, although it may seem like it is to us, given how we are writing about it. But it's not easy. We had to read this over and over, and still got confused about where He was going. However, by highlighting these two quotes, we found something of a guidepost. They kept us on the right track and allowed us to get a glimmer of His vision. So if you, dear Reader, have trouble following what we are saying, or where He is going, we encourage you to read ahead. And if you do, we would also encourage you to read to paragraph 202, as it seems that He goes on a bit of a tangent after that, even though it is still related to this theme.
Another thing we noticed in this paragraph is the strange path He seems to take in the middle of it. He says, in one sentence, that each Manifestation has:
1. a distinct individuality
2. a definitely prescribed mission
3. a
predestined Revelation, and
4. specially designated limitations
In the following sentence He says that they each have:
A. a different name
B. a special attribute
C. a definite Mission, and
D. a particular Revelation
As we have done much earlier in our study of this book, we find that we can link these two lists. We can say that 1 is a, 2 is b, 3 is c, and 4 is d. But as we do so, we find that it is not quite so. Well, it is, but it only seems as if they're not quite lined up. We would expect "mission" to line up with "Mission" and "Revelation" to line up with "Revelation". But they don't. They're one off. Syncopated, if you will.Why?
For us, it feels as if we are marching forward with His ideas, and then stumble. When you are walking forward and stumble, there are a few things you can do. First, you can stop and get your footing again. Or second, you can fall. But the third option is to allow your momentum to carry you forward and take a few faltering steps as you regain your rhythm. It is that third option that we feel here.
It seems to us that the whole notion of seeing these two quotes as describing the same thing, the oneness of the Manifestations while still acknowledging their differences, is so difficult for so many of us that even here He is recognizing that feeling of discomfort. In fact, He even seems to be encouraging it. That, to us, is how difficult a concept we think this entire section is.
While we could spend a long time talking about how these two lists really do line up, and the truths we can get from it, we will refrain from doing so. Instead, we will encourage you to meditate upon it. Or as He said so often earlier in this volume, "ponder", "reflect", "consider". "Meditate profoundly".
As we move forward in this whole section, we feel that the fog we may be seeing right now will begin to lift, just as it does when the sun begins to rise.